Subject Award · Social Sciences · 2026
The Psychology Subject Award 2026 has been decided. Congratulations to Willem Kuyken of University of Oxford, chosen from ten finalist universities, each represented by an academic whose recent work shows what world-class collaboration looks like: a real project, drawn from the open scholarly record, cited so you can check it.

Winner · Psychology Subject Award 2026
The finalists
Professor of Mindfulness and Psychological Science at the University of Oxford, Willem Kuyken researches how psychological approaches prevent depression. He led the multi-institution MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial with Cambridge, UCL, Exeter and King's College London, evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training for adolescent mental health.
How COVID-19 shaped mental health: from infection to pandemic effects
This review considers the mental health consequences of COVID-19 at two levels: the effects of infection itself, and the effects of living through a pandemic. Keeping those strands apart matters, because they arise through different routes and call for quite different responses from clinicians and from policy.
Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Beyond its direct physical toll, COVID-19 placed a heavy burden on mental health, and earlier epidemics offer a point of comparison. Searching five databases and synthesising prevalence estimates from probability samples during COVID-19 and past outbreaks, the study assembles a picture of mental disorder in the general community rather than only among patients already in care.
Executive Dean of the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King's College London and Professor of General Hospital Psychiatry, Matthew Hotopf studies links between mental and physical health. His multi-university NHS CHECK cohort tracked the mental health of healthcare workers in England across the first three years of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance
Minority stress theory, first articulated in integrative form in 2003, explains how social, psychological and structural factors produce mental health inequalities facing sexual minority populations. Reviewing two decades of developments, the work weighs critiques and applications of the theory and reflects on its continued relevance amid rapidly changing social and policy contexts.
Data on transgender and gender diverse people who return to living as their sex assigned at birth have been scarce, leaving the topic to argument rather than evidence. Drawing on the US Transgender Survey of 27,715 adults, the study examines how many reported a history of detransition and the reasons they gave, combining multiple-choice answers with analysis of their own written responses.
Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention
Personality traits carry real consequences and can shift across a lifetime, but whether people can deliberately change them was unsettled. A three-month digital intervention was tested in a randomised controlled trial with 1,523 participants: the intervention group changed more than controls and in the directions they intended, changes that people close to them also noticed and that were still present three months later.
Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.
Psychologists increasingly model constructs as networks of interacting parts, and have moved from describing single networks to comparing them across populations, but the statistical tools were missing. This article presents the network comparison test, which uses resampling-based permutation testing to compare two independent data sets on network structure, the strength of individual connections, and overall strength.
Dehumanization: Beyond the Intergroup to the Interpersonal
Professor of Psychology at the University of Melbourne, Nick Haslam studies dehumanisation, stigma and the shifting boundaries of psychological concepts. His collaborative work with colleagues at Deakin University and the University of Minnesota extends dehumanisation research beyond intergroup conflict to everyday interpersonal relationships, showing how subtle denials of humanity shape social life.
Mindfulness-based programmes are being widely implemented to reduce stress in nonclinical settings, yet a comprehensive evidence synthesis had been lacking. Following a detailed preregistered protocol developed with public and professional stakeholders, the team searched thirteen databases and systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials to assess whether such programmes actually promote mental health compared with no intervention or alternatives.
Exclusive to partners
Partners verify their data and feature their academics. Finalists were identified from open data; winners were decided by our editorial team and announced on 15 September 2026.
Explore partnership →The wider slate
Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8
Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8
The prevalence of mental health problems in sub-Saharan adolescents: A systematic review
Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8
Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap
The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry
Digital interventions for the treatment of depression: A meta-analytic review.
Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology